Sunday, August 28, 2011

Dissolve KCHR Take over Pattanam excavation by ASI Placed comment in Feb 2011 in my Twitter that there are violations of research ethics in pattanam

I placed a comment in Feb 2011 in my Twitter that there are violations of research ethics in the Pattanam excavation headed by KCHR, Trivandrum... Later in April and May 2011 I have published Copies of the Orders received by Centre for Heritage studies Hill palace Thrippunitthura Ernakulam and the report submitted by P K Gopi,Registrar CHS to Archaeological survey of India ,in my Blog” malayaalan-malayaalanblogspot.com”and in my web www.malabarandkeralastudies.net .

You may kindly go through this site to evaluate my academic /and research works also.

In my academic life I have seen various kinds of Violation of research Ethics .There are academicians and researchers who have no intellectual honesty. I used to fight against such

Tendencies in research activities.

The present issue is one of the best examples of Intellectual Dishonesty, Violation of ethics of research, violation of Govt: rules related to Archaeological excavations, Suppression of facts, giving misinformation’s to academic and public world Etc related to a research work in an Area of very high Archaeological potential. Please see my opinions.

With regards

Dr N M Nampoothiri 27/8/2011

Bring control of Pattanam Excavation under Archaeological Survey of India

Dr N M NAMPOOTHIRI

1. A S I must take up the Complete charge of Excavations at PaTTaNam,Kerala

2 KCHR is to be removed from the responsibility of pattanam research and it must be dissolved.

3Action must be taken against the present Director for the violation of the existing laws of the land and propagating religious Fanaticism..

4 Rename the present Excavation to” KODUNGALLUR EXCAVATIONS.”

5 Rename the Muziris Heritage project as Kodungallur Heritage Project.

Initially The Excavation at paTTanam was a research project done by CHS. The Registrar of CHS submitted a project to Archaeological survey of India in April 2003 and got sanction on 1/3/2004 to do primary digging at Pattanam. P K Gopi, was the director of the excavation. Dr Selvakumar and Jenny peter were the Co directors. On April 22, 23,and 24 -2011 primary trenches were taken and artifacts were collected .The registrar submitted a detailed scientific report to ASI and the report was published in the Journal of CHS in 2005. (8 pages. See my blog) The report was the first of its kind in Kerala archaeology and a breakthrough in Cranganuur excavations.

During 1996 to 2004 this Selvakumar and another researcher K P Shajan were doing Exploration and Excavations in Cranganuur area on both banks of river Periyar. Nearly 40 places were Excavated by them and many artifacts were collected and transferred them to Union Christian College Alwaye in 1998. Dr P J Cheriyan ,the present Director of KCHR was a member of these activities; he was a lecturer in History in the U C College. at that time

The team Dr. Cheryan, Dr. Selvakumar, and K P Shajan never mention the primary digging done by CHS or the detailed report .Even in the reports of KCHR, the pioneering work of GREAT importance is not mentioned in the proper way .The new findings of KCHR are not much compared to CHS findings.

The KCHR team is misinforming the academic world that the pioneering works are done by them. Actually what happened was that Cheriyan, Selvakumar and Shajan gradually taken up the research project to KCHR even at the time of the primary trenching in 2004.Selvan and Shajan were associated with CHS and KCHR at the same time .KCHR is a Trust which is working on Govt grants. CHS is a Govt institution to do such works. There is no need to criticize the starting of a new project by KCHR.

The Work of CHS was headed by P K Gopi and not by Shajan etc. KCHR made only a passing remark on this excavation report. In their “muziris heritage project- Pattanam Heritage project -2008’ a report circulated, there is no reference of the crucial findings of CHS .It starts with excavations of 2007.Photographs of Chera Coins and other artifacts are given in this report but the findings of CHS is not even mentioned The CHS collected the Amphora pieces Beads of various kinds, precious stones rouletted wares and Chera Coins. They reported about a ring well, bricks and brick wall. KCHR kept silence about P K GOPI, the Director of Excavations or these crucial findings. It is a suppression of facts...

Shajan conducted many excavations in this archaeologically potential areas and shifted artifacts to UC College Alwye Shajan in his Phd thesis says that antiquities collected through excavation from pattanam and other areas were handed over to U C College cultural study centre.

“Archaeological survey has been carried out in order to find past cultural remains in the study area. Archaeological objects and pottery of various cultures were collected from a number of sites in the coastal areas of Thrissur and Ernakulum dt. Even though no systematic archaeological excavation was conducted in this regard, exploration and trial trenching have been carried out to recover archaeological objects. The collected materials are now kept in the archaeological museum, centre for cultural and ecological studies Union Christian College Alwaye

Dr Cheriyan was working there at that time.

Shajan conducted exhibition of these items on 23 -11-2003 and later announced that the team almost located the port MUZIRIS. In March 2011 CHS obtained permission to conduct Excavations. On March 23 and 28 Shajan met the media and told them that Hunting for Muziris is almost successful. Later in 2006 Shajan and Mr Selvakumar announced through BBC that

“They placed the ancient port as having existed where the small town of Pattanam now stands. The team believes Pattanam as the place where Muziris once stood.” Shajan said ”We believe it could be Muziris.”

On 23 march 2004(one month before the starting of excavation by CHS), Shajan conducted an exhibition at Trivandrum with the help of KCHR. The media report goes thus:

”Pattanam near North Paravur was the ancient city of Muziris or part of Muziris according to geo-archaeological evidences unearthed during a study led by researcher K P..Shajan. The other members of the research team Included Roberta Tomber of the University of Southampton, V Selvakumar of the centre for historical study ,Thrippuuniththura, and Kerala Council of historical research Director Dr P J Cheriyan---.Fragments of Imported Roman amphora used for importing wine, and other materials Yemanese and west asian pottery, were found at Pattanam.The Indian roulette ware-----was also found.Bricks tiles pottery beads and artifacts found at pattanam were very similar to those found----at Arikkamedu.”

How these valuables were obtained to K P Shajan and his team – Roberta Tomber, a foreigner,Dr selvakumar ,and Dr Cheriyan? The excavations of CHS were not begun.

Selvan was the Co-director of the project of CHS! All of them are in double role!!.

What was the role of P J Cheriyan in this excavation and exhibition?

How a foreigener was associate in this trenching?

Now the question is from where did they get these antiquities? There was a panel discussion about these finds. The Kerala university V C Dr Iqbal Dr Michael tharakan attended the exhibition

Was there any permission to conduct excavations and Exhibitions in this manner and to make such announcements in 2004 march??

It is said that many people are doing surveys and excavation works in the archaeologically high potential area. We have to look in to the matter very seriously . Otherwise the valuable archaeological and historical places and evidences will be lost forever. KCHR director has made a request to the Prime minister of India and UPA chairperson to take necessary steps to make avail 45 hectors of land for Pattanam excavations! It is reported in internet media . He has pointed out the necessity of 5 acres in another context also.

"People are digging the land for constructing houses, building roads and digging wells there," P.J. Cherian, director of the Kerala Council for Historical Research (KCHR), told IANS here.

KCHR along with the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) have been conducting this ambitious research as part of the Muziris Heritage Project.

"We need this land - at least five acres of the 45 hectares - to be acquired by the state government - not by force, but by taking the locals into confidence and paying them a reasonable price."

Archaeologists K.P. Shajan and V. Selvakumar along with Cherian have been involved in the excavations at Pattanam, where evidence of human habitation dating back to the Iron Age has been found.

However, the state government has not able to acquire the land.

Cherian said he and the archaeologists were very "clear" - they do not want to antagonize the local people who had been offering whole-hearted support for the excavations. (The Hindu August 8 ,2700)

This is the situation at “pattaNam “ ASI must interfere in this issue at the earliest.ASI must withdraw the permission given to KCHR or any other institutions to conduct excavations at Cranganuur area including pattanam. along with this ASI must take up the Explorations and Excavations and renovations of early structures under there on control.

There is no meaning in the concept of “Muziris heritage Project It is totally a publicity and marketing idea.It is false

.None of the places or structures hold any heritage factor of Muziris.They are all modern items compared to Muziris factors.

KCHR started their work in pattanam area only in 2007.Benny Kuriakose, an Engineer was given the charge of Muziris Heritage project by KCHR in 2006!. Now according to The Hindu, The excavations by KCHR were started in 2005!

“ He drew the muziris plan in 2006” media reports says. How can it is possible? He says that he started the project in 2008 with an aid of 41 crore rupees as central govt aid.In sept 2009 another allotment of 141 crore was made by Govt of Kerala.Hon: Finance minister of Kerala made this announcement :The Muziris Heritage project a unique tourism and conservation project linking monuments in the area surrounding the bygone 2000 year old Muzirisport will be opened to the public next month”

“. Kuriakose, an alumnus of the College of Engineering (he has a degree in Civil Engineering), the Government Arts College and the Model School in the city, began his career as an apprentice to late architect Laurie Baker. Soon he found his calling in conservation and is today, one of India's leading conservation architects renowned for his tsunami reconstruction projects in Nagapattinam, rehabilitation villages for victims of the Latur and Kutch earthquakes, Dakshinachitra heritage centre, near Chennai, and so on.”

He says ” Brick by brick, stone by stone, the ancient port city of Muziris, which was once one of the most important centres of maritime trade in the world, is being restored to its former glory under the Muziris Heritage Project of the Government of Kerala. At the helm of this ambitious project (currently one of the biggest conservation efforts in India), is its chief consultant, conservation architect Benny Kuriakose. The Chennai-based Kuriakose, who grew up in the city, was here recently for a seminar on conservation. He got chatting about the restoration efforts in and around Kodungalloor taluk in Thrissur district and North Paravur taluk in Ernakulam district, the area of the ‘Muziris Heritage Site.'”

“Kuriakose drew up the Muziris plan in 2006 and the project was started in September 2008 in collaboration with 19 government departments and agencies, with Central Government aid of Rs. 41 crore – the biggest allocation for a conservation plan ever. In the initial phase of the project, four of the 27 odd museums, namely the Paliam Kovilakam, the Paliam Nalukettu and two synagogues, and two archaeological sites, namely, Pattanam and Kottapuram Fort, will shortly be opened to the public.”

“It will not be your usual museum visit. Nor will it solely cater for tourism. All these monuments are connected and we want to tell a story – the story of Kerala – through them. Wherever there are missing links there will be museums (such as the Chavittunatakam Centre at Gothuruthu, Syrian Christian History Museum at Kodungalloor, Traditional Lifestyle Museum at Chendamangalam, Armory Museum at Kottapuram fort and so on). The Muziris Heritage Project is primarily intended to be a centre for education rather than tourism, with focus on sustainability and involvement of the local communities,” explains Kuriakose, adding that the master plan is a model one for conservation in Kerala because it follows international guidelines such as UNESCO charters on heritage conservation, the Nara Document on Authenticity, ICOMOS (International Council of Monuments and Sites) charters and so on. “

Muziris Heritage Site and various Museums (Note prepared for discussion on 21 and 23 November 2009) mention 18 Museums. Heritage centres or museums are not yet seen any were in the so called so called Muziris Area. Renovation of structures of this nature must be done with the permission of ASI. We hope such orders were issued to KCHR.

The publicity given to the name Miseries and its identification of Muziris with Pattanam , in India and abroad is only the outcome of all these activities. There seem to be some hidden agenda behind in these false statements .It is not proper way of research. The archaeological excavations and explanations given to the Findings are predetermined.

Social history-Dangerous Comments by Dr Cheriyan

Dr Cheriyan has made some remarks about Brahmins and Savarnas of Kerala in May 2011. A piece of pottery having three letters was collected from the trench. The scripts are said to be Brahmi and the letters are ca ma Na / a ma Na which denote Sramana or Jains according to them. This is said to be an inscription of first or second century BC.

The disappearance of Port Muziris and its maritime trade activities after first century AD was interpreted in this way.

Some prominent writes wrote in 2010

“When did Muchiri disappear and how? Who were the makers of the glory that was Muchiri, and what happened to them? With the official establishment turning the history project into one of tourism, there is no serious attempt to find answers to these questions.
The official Kerala Tourism website attributes the port’s disappearance to natural causes and European colonisation. It says, “The Muziris port underwent a tragic incident some time around the middle of the 14th century in a massive flood and resultant silting triggered by the river Periyar.-----“

“Whatever the explanation for the disappearance of the structures, it is reasonable to assume that the port’s decline began with the establishment of a feudal order dominated by the Vedic community, which looked down upon seafaring, between the 8th and 10th century.(B R P Bhasker-reported in The Hindu.)

In May 2011 a group of scholers visited Pattanam .Dr Cheriyan gave the following interpretation about the Social History of Kerala:

Why he is bringing such comments of Religious Faunaticism ? on the basis of this statement alone he must be removed from the responsibility of pattanam research and action must be taken against him for making Religious friction .KCHR is aCouncil of prominent historians.they are bound to answer these type of activities of Cheryan

I personally believe that the pattanam paithruka samrakshana samithi and such other groups are coming up because of these type of ideas are being propagated by pattanam excavation authorities.This council must be dissolved on the basis of their activities against the law of the land.

______________________________________________________________________________

Report ; 7/5/2011

Pattanam: A Rupture in the Cultural History of Kerala

// May 7th, 2011 // Cultural Politics The Hindu

“”:On reading my article on Buddhism in Kerala on this very blog, Prof P J Cherian the director of Kerala Council for Historical Research invited me to visit the excavation site at Pattanam near North Paravur in Ernakulam district in central Kerala.

It is in connection with the Muziris heritage project to re-invent and conserve the cultural history and archeological legacy of Kodungallur/Muchiri or Muziris that this extensive digging up is done in various locations on the northern side of the Vadakekara bridge towards the west of NH 17.

Kerala’s historic connections with the rest of the world as far as Arabia,China,Rome and the Mediterranean are unearthed through concerted and dedicated effort of KCHR under the leadership of Prof Cherian. Researchers and expert students from various parts of the world including Britain are involved in the work in progress that began a couple of years ago.

I visited Pattanam along with Prof Laxman of Madras Institute of Developmental Studies, Dr George K Alex of Kozhanchery St Thomas College and Dr Sundarbabu of Vikas Adhyayan Kendra, Mumbai. We were together in an international colloquium on Caste, Religion and Culture at Kochi.

We reached Pattanam just a few miles north of Paravur that still spots its Jew street, cemetery and synagogue around 7am on the bright sunny morning of May 3, 2011. Pattanam means port city in ancient Tamil and even in current Malayalam like Valapattanam in Malabar or Nagapattanam in Tamil Nadu. Most of the old place names in Kerala that was part of the Chera kingdom of the ancient Tamil country were formed during the ancient Tamilakam era during or soon after the Sangham period (BC 5th to AD 5th centauy) that is known for ancient Sramana Tamil epics Chilapatikaram andManimekhalai.

Prof Cherian welcomed us and showed the details of excavations and allowed us to see and touch the strands of Kerala’s past that is preserved in the various layers of the soil in the pits. He explained to us about iron based early human habitations here in the BC era. According to him Jews reached these shores probably around first century BC and they could be the first converts to Christianity here. The legend of St Thomas reaching Malankara in AD 52 could not be an impossibility according to him. The myth of the first Brahman converts is clearly a later bogus fabrication by a threatened minority community under Brahmanical hegemony that persecuted minorities like Jains and Buddhists and annihilated them from the soil of Kerala for ever.

Then with the help of terracotta ware called Indian rouletted-ware belonging to around fourth or third century BC he explained that there was a clear presence of Sramana groups and trading communities from the north from the third century BC onwards. Brahmi script used to write on the terracotta ware in old Tamil language was introduced in south India by these Sramana or Chamana or Amana sages who reached the south with their trading and mercantile brethren.

The Hindu daily has recently reported the finding of these earthen ware with the inscription in Brahmi Tamil script “Amana” meaning Sramana or Jain/Buddhist in origin. It clearly establishes the fact that Kerala was civilized by Sramana sages in BC fourth/third century itself.

This concrete historical and archeological evidences prove that the light of letters and ethics were spread among the people of south India by Buddhism and Jainism as early as fourth or third century BC against the Hindu hegemonic claims of Brahmanism civilizing Kerala in the seventh or eighth century AD.

Dedicated experts involved in patient and painstaking perusal and careful classification of thousands of potsherds everyday. Prof Cherian says “they don’t lie…” about our pasts

Prof Cherian showed us small beads and Roman amphora and other vessels belonging to the Mediterranean lands. The Vesuvian volcanic minerals in the potsherds are clearly visible even after 2000 years. The bitumen coating in some of them are still intact and they belong to West Asia. These handicrafts of clay from ancient civilizations never lie about their time and place according to Prof Cherian. Chera coins with the impression of bow and arrow (symbolizing the Villava legacy) were also recovered from the site. These findings establish the historical validity of Sangham literature and early literary references in old Tamil regarding the cultural pasts of Chera land and the ancient Tamil country comprising Chola and Pandya kingdoms along with it. After all we got vivid references of Muchiri from ancient Tamil epics.

This indeed is a break and rupture in Kerala’s cultural history and archeology. It marks a moment of paradigm shift and radical departure for all who served the dominant and hegemonic Hindu Savarna or Brahmanical versions of the pasts of Kerala repressively established through epistemological violence and erasure and covet silence by some of the high priests, sacred ideologues and Savarna headmen who monopolized and policed speech, letters, politics and history in this small part of the world.

Even the orthodox and official historians who are keeping mum would have to accept the concrete tangible evidences this excavation has rediscovered in an undeniable and profounder way. Let us appreciate the phenomenal work materialized by KCHR under the leadership of Prof P J Cherian and friends.

Prof P J Cherian, Director, KCHR leading the excavations at Pattanam and disseminating knowledge to the people and enlightening us on our cultural pasts and legacies

This radical moment prompts us to continue our search and excavations in other parts of Kerala especially in Cherthala and Alapuzha regions where the huge wooden ship was unearthed in similar attempts earlier. The extensive archeological studies in Kuttanad and neighborhoods especially Karthikappally, Mavelikara, Karunagapally, Kayamkulam, Thotapally, Trikunapuzha, Aratupuzha regions would also produce valuable findings regarding the real and vital past of Kerala.

The Government, departments concerned and other institutions in the field may address these key cultural tasks ahead with revitalized energy and ethical commitment to people and their lived history. Let us recover our real history and make it visible and tangible for posterity.””

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

KCHR WRITINGS

“Introduction ,Report submitted to ASI by KCHR -2007

The site was first located by Shajan K P (1998) based on the information given by Mr. Vinodan, a resident of Pattanam. The surveys and explorations (1996-98) by the archaeology students of the Centre for Ecological and Cultural Studies, U C College Alwaye also paved the way towards identifying the latent potential of the site. Subsequently, the site was investigated by a group of researchers in 2003 and 2004 and a hypothesis that, it could be the location of ancient Muziris was put forth (Shajan et al. 2004, 2005, 2006).

In 2004, trial excavations were undertaken at the site by the Centre for Heritage Studies and a preliminary culture-chronological sequence was proposed (Selvakumar et al. 2005; Shajan and Selvakumar 2006; Tomber 2005). Intensive and systematic surface surveys were undertaken at this site by Shinu Abraham in 2005 and 2006 (Abraham 2005, 2006). Against this backdrop, the research at Pattanam was initiated by the KCHR under the aegis of the Muziris Heritage Project of the Kerala Government.

Explorations and salvage excavations conducted by various individuals (Gurukkal 1987, Rajan Chedambath 1997, Cherian 1996-1998, Shajan 1998) and institutions such as Union Christian College [Centre for Ecological and Archaeological Studies] and Kerala State Archaeology Department had brought to light several megalithic burial sites in the Lower Periyar basin. However, habitation remains related to the megalithic period remained as elusive as ever. In this context of paucity of material evidence for the Early Historic Indo-Roman trade on the Malabar Coast, the discovery of Pattanam can be said to be a major breakthrough.”

Muziris Heritage Project

Muziris Heritage Project is an attempt at retrieving the historical heritage of the Kodungallur-Paravur region. It involves archaeological and historical research, documentation and publication. The project proposes to research, conserve and manage the historical, archaeological, ecological and cultural resources of the Kodungallur region, covering the Lower Periyar Basin, lying between North Parur in the south and Mathilakam in the north, down to the Arabian Sea from Krishnankotta and Mala in the east. The project further explores the possibility of conservation, renovation and reconstruction. The constructions of heritage museums, site museums, publications are also the objectives of the project.

The major historical sites covered by this project include Kottapuram Fort, Cheraman Parambu, Thiruvanchikulam Temple, Cheraman Masjid, Tali Shiva Temple, Sri Kurumba Bhagavathy Temple, Krishnan Kotta, Kottayil Kovilakam, Chennamangalam Synagogue, Jewish Cemetery, Vaippincotta Seminary, Holy Cross Church, Palium Dutch Palace, Pallipuram Fort, St Thomas Church and Kodungallur Kovilakam. KCHR, identified as the nodal agency for Muziris Heritage Project provides academic guidance and undertake archaeological / historical researches in the region. The implementation agencies are Tourism, Archaeology and Revenue Departments of the state.

________________________

Monday, August 22, 2011

Arikkamed 1 c.A D.maps mark Muziris at periyar rivermouth




The Bead SiteHome>Ancient Beads> Middle East > Indian Ocean Trade

Early Navigation and Trade in the Indian Ocean (Ravenna, Italy 4-7 July 2002)
Is.I.A.O. (Istituto Italiano per l'Africa e l'Oriente), Università di Bologna - Sede di Ravenna
Dipartimento di Archeologia dell'Università di Bologna and Fondazione Flaminia

THE BEAD TRADE IN THE INDIAN OCEAN, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE
TO BERENIKE, EGYPT
(Part One of Three)

Pete Francis

Beads make ideal trade items because they are highly portable and treasured where they are imported. To our advantage, many are made of durable materials and last into the archaeological record. They are, for example, the oldest known form of art.

From the beginning, I will tell you what many of you already know. I am something of an evangelist for beads. I believe their scientific, humanistic study can teach us much about the past. In this short time, I want to show you some examples of that.

In terms of beads, Berenike, Egypt, principally traded with India. From the third century B.C. through the second century A.D. the trade was mostly with South India. The garnets (left) and quartz (right) stone beads look like they came from Arikamedu or perhaps Kodumanal in the south. The small, drawn (cut from a tube) Indo-Pacific glass beads also look like they were coming from there.

Indo-Pacific beads were not very numerous in those centuries, making up only about four percent of the beads excavated. However, after the hiatus of the third century, they become very important, making up some 40% of the beads on the site. They were not from Arikamedu.

We do not have them analyzed yet, but the colors make it quite clear that they were coming from Mantai, at the northern end of Sri Lanka.

Arikamedu did not make orange glass beads (see left). Mantai did (right)
and also made an unusual green-blue glass, unlike that of Arikamedu or other
Indo-Pacific beadmaking site.

What happened? In the first and second centuries, the principal South Indian port was Muziris, on the Malabar Coast. Muziris was mentioned in the Periplus of the Erythraean Sea, in Ptolemy's Geography, and is prominent on the Peutinger Table. It is also celebrated in the Tamil-language Sangam poetry. Yet, no one has ever identified it.

Left: a section of the map of India drawn after Ptolomy's Geographia. Muziris empo-rium is clearly more important than neighboring towns.
As it was an "emporium," Roman merchants lived there for some time.

The Sangam poems never describe large buildings at Muziris, only its role as a port. Neither Muziris nor Westerners are mentioned after the first century. The "Augustinian Temple" on the Peutinger Table is, in my opinion, a mishearing of a temple to Agastya, the Patron Saint of South India.

Right: section of the Peutinger Table,
perhaps a fifth century copy of a third century copy of a first century map.


    Map of South India. It appears that raw materials for stone and glass beadmakers came from an area just off the northwest corner of the map and from around Kodumanal (on the Noyil River) to Arikamedu (west coast) and Kodumanal. Their beads passed through the Palghat Gap and down river to Muziris for export to the Roman West. A maritime route, involving Mantai, Sri Lanka, may also have been used.

The Sangam poets put Muziris on the Periyar River (see map). But "periyar" just means
"big river." There were several "Periyar Rivers" in Sangam times and the Periyar of today may well not be the Periyar of the past, especially along the shifting Malabar Coast
(Francis 2002: 119-120).

It seems likely that Muziris was a small fishing village with a temporarily good port down-stream from the Palghat Gap, one of the few places where one can cross the Western Ghat mountain range. Just over the gap is the lapidary-jewelry site of Kodumanal, very close to the source of beryl and other gems, as well as pepper and cardamom-growing regions. Arikamedu probably sent its gemstone and glass beads in this direction, as well
(Francis 2002: 121-122).

The Romans found it a good place to trade, but after the Romans left, it fell back to sleep. When the Romans returned a century later, there was not much there and they kept on going until the reached the bustling port of Mantai. As confirmation of this, Roman coins are very scarce in Sri Lanka until the fourth century, when they appear in large quantities
(Weerakkody 1997: 163-154).

The case of the mysterious Muziris is an example of what we can learn when
we incorporate bead evidence into our understanding of trading networks.
Many other things can be learned as well.

Part Two: Beads and the Demographics of Berenike

__________________________________________________


Friday, August 5, 2011

No evidence to identyfy paTTaNam as MUZIRIS.Nagaswamy

Pattanam and Muziris-

Time has not come to identify Pattanam as Muziris,

Time has not come to identify Pattanam as Muziris, R. Nagaswamy, former Vice-Chancellor of Kanchipuram University, has said.
In his inaugural address at a seminar on ‘Muziris heritage and Pattanam excavations — a critical review' organised by the Muziris Heritage Preservation Forum here on Thursday, Dr. Nagaswamy, former Director of the Tamil Nadu State Archaeology Department, said that many scholars had written that a part of Kodungalloor could have been Muziris.
“It would be advisable that Kodungalloor is also excavated, like Pattanam, extensively. Let both materials be compared before arriving at any conclusion. We have to wait for more excavations. Archaeology requires a lot of evidence. We cannot jump into conclusions. I think there is need to excavate Kodungalloor region also and then compare the findings,” he said.
Praising the excavators for the good job done at Pattanam, Dr. Nagaswamy, who visited the Pattanam excavation site on Thursday morning, said it was really striking and wonderful that an enormous number of a particular type of potsherd has been found in a very small area. These are storage jars with double handle and conical bottoms used for storing olive oil, wine, fish, etc, he said.
‘Extraordinary finds'
Stating that P.J. Cherian, Director, Kerala Council for Historical Research, had told him that about 6,800 broken pottery of this particular variety had been found in three trenches at the site, Dr. Nagaswamy said this was extraordinary. He said that this referred to the presence of a big population, which had come down by way of trade to the west coast.
Dr. Nagaswamy said that square copper coins (on one side elephant and on the other bows and arrows) had also been found at the site. “These type of coins were issued in the beginning of the Christian era. But what has not been found is one type of highly polished red type of pottery with the stamp of Roman potters. That has been found in the east coast in excavations near Puducherry,” he said.
Dr. Nagaswamy said there was lack of evidence to show that the artefacts unearthed at Pattanam came specifically from Rome. ‘‘We are yet to get more information that this is connected directly to Italy,'' he said.
T. Sathyamoorthy, former Director, Department of Archaeology, Kerala, presided. The ‘Muziris-Attimariyude Reethisasthram' published by the Muziris Heritage Preservation Forum was released on the occasion.

Pattanam and Muziris

Time has not come to identify Pattanam as Muziris,




Time has not come to identify Pattanam as Muziris, R. Nagaswamy, former Vice-Chancellor of Kanchipuram University, has said.
In his inaugural address at a seminar on ‘Muziris heritage and Pattanam excavations — a critical review' organised by the Muziris Heritage Preservation Forum here on Thursday, Dr. Nagaswamy, former Director of the Tamil Nadu State Archaeology Department, said that many scholars had written that a part of Kodungalloor could have been Muziris.
“It would be advisable that Kodungalloor is also excavated, like Pattanam, extensively. Let both materials be compared before arriving at any conclusion. We have to wait for more excavations. Archaeology requires a lot of evidence. We cannot jump into conclusions. I think there is need to excavate Kodungalloor region also and then compare the findings,” he said.
Praising the excavators for the good job done at Pattanam, Dr. Nagaswamy, who visited the Pattanam excavation site on Thursday morning, said it was really striking and wonderful that an enormous number of a particular type of potsherd has been found in a very small area. These are storage jars with double handle and conical bottoms used for storing olive oil, wine, fish, etc, he said.
‘Extraordinary finds'
Stating that P.J. Cherian, Director, Kerala Council for Historical Research, had told him that about 6,800 broken pottery of this particular variety had been found in three trenches at the site, Dr. Nagaswamy said this was extraordinary. He said that this referred to the presence of a big population, which had come down by way of trade to the west coast.
Dr. Nagaswamy said that square copper coins (on one side elephant and on the other bows and arrows) had also been found at the site. “These type of coins were issued in the beginning of the Christian era. But what has not been found is one type of highly polished red type of pottery with the stamp of Roman potters. That has been found in the east coast in excavations near Puducherry,” he said.
Dr. Nagaswamy said there was lack of evidence to show that the artefacts unearthed at Pattanam came specifically from Rome. ‘‘We are yet to get more information that this is connected directly to Italy,'' he said.
T. Sathyamoorthy, former Director, Department of Archaeology, Kerala, presided. The ‘Muziris-Attimariyude Reethisasthram' published by the Muziris Heritage Preservation Forum was released on the occasion.